Sitemap
Contact
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
1. An Overview of
The First Time
Because our Puritan-based society has traditionally been uneasy
Addiction and
At the same time, marijuana is an attractive activity for
Strategies of Smokers
There are some smokers who are convinced that "good
Stopping
Notes
14. Looking Ahead:
Smokers of this persuasion speak of marijuana being grown by
In the event of legalization, it is unlikely that names will
The Moment of Awareness
Appendix
On the other hand, I very often have magnificent creative
2. A Denver high school
I don't know if you're interested, but the reason I started
|
Brain Damage
It
has long been known that marijuana produces temporary and dose-related
alterations in brain waves, but an idea has lingered, probably dating from the
anti-marijuana propaganda of the 1930s, that cannabis might cause irreversible
brain damage. Two studies have produced disturbing evidence in this regard. The
more important research was reported by A. M. C. Campbell and his associates in
the December 1971 issue of The Lancet, a British medical journal. The
authors claimed that there was evidence of cerebral atrophy (a wasting away of
brain tissues) in ten patients who had used cannabis extensively. This
observation was the result of a painful and potentially hazardous procedure
known as an air encephalogram, and other researchers have been reluctant to
repeat it.
Critics of the experiment point out several problematic facts
about the ten subjects. All had used LSD, some fairly often, and eight of the
ten had extensive experience with amphetamines. Most of the subjects had used
various other drugs as well, including morphine and heroin. At least one of the
patients was an epileptic another was mentally retarded, as many as five were
thought to be schizophrenic, and several had suffered head injuries from
accidents. Moreover, the subjects in this study had been selected because they
all showed symptoms of senility, and a few were actually known to have birth
defects. In other words, this study was so flawed as to be virtually
meaningless.
The other study that has caused concern was concluded by Dr.
Robert Heath at the Tulane University School of Medicine. Heath recorded the
brain waves of six rhesus monkeys before, during, and after exposure to
marijuana smoke and found that the monkeys showed changes for as long as five
days after such exposure. In addition, two of the monkeys suffered
"structural alteration of cells in the spetal region of the brain,"
and Heath stated that previous correlations between monkeys and human beings
suggested that the chronic smoking of marijuana produces irreversible damage in
humans.
Heath's report was made public at a Senate subcommittee hearing
investigating marijuana and health. Dr. Julius Axelrod, who received the Nobel
Prize in 1970 for his work on the effects of drugs on the brain, was asked to
evaluate the Heath study. He told the senators that the amount of smoke inhaled
by the monkeys was equivalent to a human being smoking over a hundred marijuana
cigarettes each day for six months. "The results indicate that marijuana
causes an irreversible damage to the brain," said Axelrod. "But the
amounts used are so large that one wonders whether it's due to the large toxic
amounts Dr. Heath has given." A large enough dose of almost any substance
will produce negative results in animals or human beings, said Axelrod, who
believed that Heath should have administered doses of varying degrees to
determine which effects would have been produced by different levels of
marijuana. Lester Grinspoon, another critic of the Heath study, points out that
the monkeys in the experiment were forced to ingest excessive amounts of
marijuana smoke, although a monkey's lung size is only about one-fifteenth as
large as that of a human being.
At the University of Pennsylvania, a research
team headed by Dr. Igor Grant examined twenty-nine marijuana smokers and an
equivalent control group, all of them medical students. Grant and his team
administered the most sensitive neurological and neuropsychological tests
available and found no appreciable differences when they examined the brains of
the students in the two groups.
|
marijuana
smokers
"herb"
stoned
high
Иглоукалывание от курения
жизни
врача
«душа»
зрения
анализ
извне
people
some
drugs
about
there
were
their
smoking
Time
Other
like
feelings
experienced
|